03.07.07 :: Final Cut ::
For the latest updates on the world of Khyron, bookmark http://www.khyron.net/. With content updated regularly, you're sure to find your fix for all things entertaining and paranormal. As always, feel free to send any questions/comments/suggestions to
KFiles@khyron.net.
Keep your eyes peeled for the next K-Files, arriving sometime next
week. Later. ~Khyron, 2007.
Check out Khyron.net
Discuss The K-Files @ the USofE HERE

Though maybe that was a blessing in disguise. By knowing little
more than a brief summary of the events of the case going into
it, I think that I probably got more out of Zodiac the film than
someone who was more experienced in the case. Because wow...the
story absolutely blew me away. Not only was the movie itself
expertly crafted, but the complexity of the Zodiac Killer case
was like nothing I had previously experienced.
Here's a brief recap of my review of David Fincher's Zodiac:
Movies are a lot like
pastries sometimes. Some are like cookies--mostly soft filler
with bits of sweetness sprinkled throughout. But then there are
those fancy cake movies, layered in all kinds of frostings and
intricate designs. You may not be in mood for something so rich
and elaborate all of the time, but in the right occasion,
there's really no beating it. Zodiac is definitely one of these
kinds of films.
This movie is thick. With layer upon layer of characters,
locales, and twists, there is certainly plenty to keep you
interested in the elaborate plot. Clocked in at nearly 3 hours,
it in fact feels closer to double that. And therein lies both
Zodiac's greatest strength and its most glaring weakness.
There's nothing better than a great movie that is also quite
long, but also nothing worse than a long movie that you aren't
in the mood for.
Long story short, I loved the crap out of this movie.
So you can only imagine my excitement after reading on the Coast
to Coast AM schedule that the Zodiac Killer would be the topic
of Monday, March 19th's episode. I was even more excited when,
at the start of the show, host George Noory announced that it
would in fact be one of his patented 'roundtable discussion'
episodes. Though as I sat through the top of the hour newsbreak
before the interview, I began to wonder why now, some 3 weeks
after Zodiac's release, George would do a show on the subject.
Before long, I had my answer.
Expecting a discussion on the merits and accuracy of Fincher's
Zodiac, I was more than a little surprised to discover
that all 3 members of the roundtable--Ed Neil, Tom Voigt, and
Michael Butterfield--were pretty big haters when it came to the
movie. Even more surprising, what little talk there was about
it came only in the final hour before George opened up
the phone lines. And, to make matters worse, Noory didn't even
know that the movie was out yet. Suffice it to say, I was kind
of disappointed.
After a day of thinking it over, I think I've decided exactly
what I didn't like about this episode. The hating on David
Fincher's Zodiac definitely didn't help, but I like a lot of
movies that people generally don't, so that didn't really bother
me. No, what bothered me were these guests. They had a sort of
smarminess about them--talking over each other, making poor
jokes, and being genuinely uninteresting to listen to. So
enthusiastic I once was about this episode, it wasn't long
before I got sidetracked with other endeavors. Likewise, as a
host, George Noory dropped the ball on this one, too. Of all the
roundtable discussions in the past, I'd have to give this one
the dubious prize of being the least entertaining.
I realize George has the difficult job of having to get
knowledgeable and interested in a plethora of different subjects
each week, but it seemed to me that he was less prepared for
this episode than usual. Though I must give him props for
opening up a 'Zodiac Confession' hotline at the end of the show.
I didn't stick around to see if he would actually call up, but I
thought that was a pretty good idea by ol' Noory.
So if you didn't catch this one on Monday night, and are
contemplating perhaps finding a copy of it to listen to, I'd
advise against it. Besides, you'd be better off spending the
nearly 3 hours watching the movie. If you can still find it at
your local theater, it will be well worth the extra effort and
cash.